RE: Rationale Behind Cell Phones for Nigerian Farmers
The Growth Enhancement Support (GES) scheme is a wonderful
idea which delivers farm inputs via electronic medium to pre-registered farmers
directly through their phones. The fact that middle men have seemingly been
eliminated from the system, thereby getting to the target of importance which
is the farmer is commendable. However, I find some taking points interesting;
1.
The according to the minister, he said “Some people think that our
farmers are uneducated and cannot use cell phones. The evidence does not
support that”. Right! So if this is the case one would expect that these
farmers would already have phones and don’t need one.
2.
There are farmers already registered on this
scheme, does it register their phones or the SIM? Because it is possible to affix the SIM on
another phone and the number would remain the same. Or are these phones going
to be equipped with special features that the SIM can only work on these phones?
Now what would be the rational of doing so? Is it to disallow the farmer use
the phone for other purposes like his daily calls and text messaging?
3.
How frequent is the message from government that
the farmers must have a dedicated phone solely for government information?
4.
Another laudable idea is the issue of preventing
contractors buying old and/or refurbished tractors, now to be done by
government who directly give it to farmers. Again what is the role of the cell
phone in this? I don’t exactly see it, if my SIM is already registered and it
is in the data base of government, I don’t see how it matters what kind of cell
phone I use to get the information be it htc, BlackBerry, Nokia, Huawei and
what not!
5.
Now the contradiction. If the article already
said our farmers are educated enough to use cell phones it then automatically
means they would own the one, because they would also know that it is a vital
accessory of their business, yet same article is telling us 71% of our farmers
do not have cell phones according to their research? In my opinion it is either
the farmers are indeed too uneducated to won a phone hence, the 71%, that there
is no network coverage in those areas or the information supplied is simply
incorrect! I mean how poor is a farmer that he won’t be able to afford a phone
yet can hire a tractor? And what kinds of phones are we looking at here?
6.
Now if the information that we have up to 14million
it then follows that we have about 10million farmers without phones if they are
in places with no coverage of what use would the phones be for them? And of these
10million farmers do we know how many are in areas with coverage? If these
farmers are widespread in the country what is the incentive for a network
company who didn’t see the need to expand to such remote area before now do so?
Of what economic benefit is a few scattered coverage is to them? And BTW have
these company been spoken to, to see the feasibility of same?
7.
The anti-climax. Farmers have been screaming
hollow that they don’t even need the phones, because they now fear that they
would be forced to jettison their old phones for the so called new phones,
even though subsidised would still be an added expenses.
Conclusion
How much really is a phone in Nigeria? And how much is a
SIM? Is it not surprising that a farmer can rent a tractor, buy fertilisers,
hire vehicles to transport their goods yet cannot afford a phone? If most
farmers are truly ‘educated’ enough to own a phone, how can this be correct? I don’t
really see the sense in this phone-for-farmers thing no matter the angle government
wants to come in from, there is hardly any farmer really into farming business that does not own a phone. However , this is
not to say ICT or technology is unimportant in agriculture far from it, in fact
it is the bedrock of opportunities in agriculture. The GES scheme is a good and
laudable one, if the claims that it has been more effective than previous are
correct. The intentions seem good even though I am yet to see physically a
farmer using this scheme, not that I am denouncing it that it exist. I would
personally want to meet a farmer on this scheme sooner or later.
Comments
Post a Comment